Statement SR-193360 · posted October 10, 2026

Compliance & DisclosureFull statement

PayPal Honey Removed From Major U.S. Affiliate Networks

PayPal's $4 billion browser extension Honey has been removed from top U.S. affiliate networks after MegaLag and Ben Edelman investigations, per Geno Prussakov's January 17 post on amnavigator.com.

By Amara Osei2 min read430 words

Statement notes

  1. PayPal acquired Honey for $4 billion in 2020, six years before the January 2026 post
  2. Major U.S. affiliate networks removed Honey from publisher rosters after MegaLag and Ben Edelman investigations
  3. Geno Prussakov published the five-lesson analysis on January 17, 2026 at amnavigator.com
  4. Honey ranked among the highest-volume publishers on top U.S. affiliate networks before the delistings
  5. PayPal has not publicly addressed whether Honey will return to affiliate networks

Major U.S. affiliate networks removed PayPal's $4 billion browser-extension Honey following investigations by MegaLag and Ben Edelman, according to a January 17 post on Geno Prussakov's Affiliate Marketing Blog at amnavigator.com.

The delistings closed a six-year run that began when PayPal completed the Honey acquisition in a deal valued at roughly $4 billion. Networks pulled Honey from publisher rosters within days of the two probes going live.

For program managers, the episode marks one of the largest publisher exits from the U.S. affiliate channel in years.

What did the investigations surface?

MegaLag released a video targeting Honey. Edelman ran a parallel investigation. Prussakov frames the combined coverage by two independent investigators as the trigger that moved networks from individual complaints to coordinated delistings within days.

How much publisher volume is at stake?

Honey operated as a publisher inside consumer-facing affiliate programs across multiple retail categories. Prussakov's framing — "removed from top U.S. affiliate networks" — places the extension among the highest-volume publishers on major U.S. rosters.

No network has publicly disclosed Honey's revenue share by program. For program managers running CPL, CPA, and rev-share deals, the delisting shifts publisher-mix reports and forces a rethink of which traffic sources fill the resulting gap during Q1 2026.

What does Prussakov recommend?

Prussakov packages the episode as a five-lesson case study for affiliate program managers. The full numbered list lives on amnavigator.com. Affiliate managers reading the post can use it as a reference for terms-of-service audits and publisher-vetting reviews during Q1 2026.

What attribution questions does this raise?

Browser-extension behavior sits at the center of the dispute. When a user activates an extension at the checkout stage, the extension can overwrite a publisher's tracking cookie before the network's pixel fires. Affiliate programs that paid on last-click revshare or CPA terms had limited visibility into whether the original publisher cookie or generated cookie received credit.

Networks have not publicly disclosed the cookie windows or attribution rules they applied when delisting Honey. That opacity leaves program managers without a clear benchmark for evaluating similar browser-extension publishers in their own rosters.

What's the forward signal?

PayPal has not stated whether Honey will return to affiliate networks under revised terms or exit the publisher business entirely. MegaLag and Edelman have not signaled follow-up investigations targeting other browser extensions. The episode gives affiliate program managers a public case file to use when reviewing terms-of-service language and publisher vetting policies through 2026.

source joinhoney.com (Original)

Filed under

Share this article:

More from Amara Osei

Amara Osei

Show full bio

Market editor covering media and advertising at RevShare Report.

50 articles

Carried forward

« Previous articleNext article »

SR-193360

End of statementThank you